Violent cartoons and TV programs encourage aggressive behaviour in pre-teen boys, says new study from the Seattle Children's Hospital Research Institute.
A new report published in the November issue of Pediatrics shows a causal link between violence in children's programming and subsequent violent behaviour in children.
"Parents have been socialized to think that cartoon violence is harmless, but it's not," says report co-author Dr. Dimitri Christakis. "Speaking broadly, the link between on-screen violence and subsequent violent behavior is as strong as evidence that smoking causes lung cancer."
Dr. Christakis and Frederick Zimmerman, PhD, both of Seattle Children’s Hospital Research Institute and the University of Washington School of Medicine, wrote the article, which is titled “Violent Television Viewing During Preschool is Associated with Anti-social Behavior During School Age.”
The study reviewed data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, which studied 8,000 U.S. families for 40 years.
One Hour of Violent TV = 3x Increased Aggression
In the study, parents of 184 boys and 146 girls aged 2 to 5 tracked what their children watched, and reported anti-social behaviour in their offsprings' later years: behaviour which included cheating, being mean, disobedience, destructiveness, and demonstrating a lack of remorse for their actions.
The researchers discovered that, for every hour that children watched violent programming in their pre-school years, their aggression increased threefold when they were aged 7 to 10.
“These findings are a bit unnerving because we know from other studies that the behaviors children manifest in early childhood track into adolescence and even into adulthood,” said Christakis. “As children grow older they gradually learn coping skills to deal with difficult situations, so it’s important to provide positive role models for them at a young age.”
However, this was only the case for boys: girls appeared impervious to violence on TV, whatever they watched. Christakis wants to study the girls' findings more closely, but for now he attributes it to the possibility that boys are biologically more prone to aggression, along with the fact that girls learn different social norms for their behaviour.
Power Rangers, Star Wars Encourages Violence; Toy Story Doesn't
Television programs such as televised football and ice hockey matches, plus many cartoons and movies with titles like Power Rangers, Star Wars, Space Jam and Spider-Man were classified as violent entertainment. These shows depict characters fighting or fleeing from violence, rejoicing in violent acts, and depicting more violence than a child would ordinarily see.
Christakis especially called out Looney Tunes cartoons in his study, telling the Seattle Post-Intelligencer that, by encouraging them to watch such violent cartoons, "You are actually teaching [children] that violence is funny."
Interestingly enough, those classic Looney Tunes cartoons were never originally intended for a children's audience. They were originally placed in front of feature films in movie theatres that showed mainstream movies like Captain Blood or Casablanca.
The report classified such films and programs like Rugrats, The Flintstones and Pixar's classic movie Toy Story as non-violent programming. A third category of educational programming was also reviewed, which featured shows like Barney, Sesame Street, Magic School Bus and Winnie-the-Pooh. Children only exhibited increased aggressive behaviour after watching the violent shows.
Educational Shows Don't Encourage Violence . . .
“This new study provides further evidence of how important and powerful television and media are as young children develop,” said report co-author Dr. Dimitri Christakis. “However, the news here is not all bad. While we found that shows like violent cartoons or football can make children more aggressive, we found no such effect for other programs such as educational ones. This points out that parents must be informed and very selective when making media choices for their children.”
. . . But Educational Shows, DVD's Aren't So Educational
Christakis and his co-author, Frederick Zimmerman, were previously known for writing a study which discovered that infants who watched educational baby videos, such as Brainy Baby,actually had smaller vocabularies than those who didn't. The Walt Disney Company, who produce and distribute Baby Einstein DVDs and other educational products, called the study misleading and unreliable and demanded that the University of Washington retract a news release on it. The university refused.
“We now recognize that content is key,” said Christakis about his new study. “Given the media saturated world that young children now inhabit, we need further research and policies to ensure that media exerts a positive influence on children.”
The copyright of the article Cartoons Cause Violence? in Animated Films is owned by Dominic von Riedemann. Permission to republish Cartoons Cause Violence? in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
One of my comments is a cartoon I used to watch back in middle school
called "Invader Zim" and they cancelled it when I was in the 7th
grade. Sometimes I wish they can bring the show back, but what they show on
it, kids may think aliens will turn their hamsters into giant monsters or
they'll be afraid of Santa Claus on Christmas or monsters on Halloween. The
point is it may be funny, but they did some pretty obsessive things on that
show. If it does come back to television one day, I think parents should
block it from their kids until they're a little bit older to see an alien
disguised as a human planning to take over the world.
Nov 23, 2008 1:05 PM
Guest :
I tend to believe that we as parents need to edit what it is that we are
allowing our children to watch. What you see and hear and what it is that
they are getting out of it are 2 different things. I know that we let my
older son watch only things that we non violent and now we have a 2 year
old and it seems that he picks up on everything possibly violent. I know
that when we watch Legend as a family thinking that it would be fine but
the truth is that he is not rawring at everyone and he even bit me. So does
it effect the children. yes! I believe that we as parents just need to
watch what they watch and if there is violence then we need to change the
channel or put on something that we know is safe.
Apr 3, 2009 8:32 AM
Guest :
So did they find the brain chemistry that isolates girls? Some social
influence? Or shall we chalk up one hour of a kid life to their entire
makeup? If you watch sad stories (Bambi?) do girls get mushy? Do boys
play nice? Was this effect true for 100% of all boys? Could it be that a
good story pumps up endorphins and imagination, and reduces inhibitions
(think alcohol) and folks will tend to do more of what they may be
preconditioned by society to do?
This type of study is way to
quick to cause corollaries... I don't think Dahmer was into action
adventure much as a young kid. He killed men, often gay, to snuggle. Sure
make some headlines and try to promote your bend, but along the way try to
separate 'study' from situation. Perhaps describe the methodology a touch,
and not go for the easy conclusion?
Apr 4, 2009 12:28 PM
Guest :
I have to say that my younger child (3.5ys) has watched more violent
television (Pokemon, Star Wars, Ben 10, etc.) at a younger age than his
older brother (7ys) -- mostly as a result of HAVING an older brother who
was watching such things -- and he DOES tend to be more aggressive and
violent... but I wonder if to some extent this is the result of trying to
hold his own with that same older brother. I'm sure there's also a
correlation between young children who watch more violent programming and
their position as younger siblings as well. Not sure which is the more
likely causal factor. (And it's also true that my older child was more
easy going from day one than his younger brother. The younger one has been
the more willful and aggressive of the two since long before he'd seen ANY
television -- certainly any Y7+ material).
Apr 27, 2009 6:53 PM
Guest :
The article describes the research as showing a "causal" link
between the viewing of violent tv and aggressive behavior, but in fact the
study does not establish this at all. It only establishes that there is a
link, which may be non-causal. The cause may be something else entirely,
such as witnessing violent behavior in the home, or parental aggression
outside the home to others. Has anyone stopped to check whether these kids
who watched a lot of tv and statistically were prone to violent behavior
also happened to come from deprived or broken homes? This seems almost too
obvious to overlook but it's another example of how statistics can be
manipulated to 'prove' just about anything.
May 2, 2009 7:30 AM
Guest :
okay so here's the deal. you people are only considering one SINGLE factor,
in a world of madness. Television and the media have an effect on behavior
in every aspect. somebody below me mentioned that girls get mushy during
sad movies, and boys get pumped up from watching "violent"
cartoons. but at what point does the parent have to step in and teach the
kids the difference between reality and a cartoon? isn't it up to the
parents to take control of the way their kids behave and ultimately teach
them the difference between right and wrong? at what point do we stop
blaming our surroundings and start taking some responsibility for our own
actions? Yes, cartoons may tend to be on the more violent side, but they
are still funny, no? jare you going to try and tell me that you've never
sat down and seen the roadrunner drop an anvil on the wiley coyotes head
and laughed about it? IT'S FUNNY, PEOPLE!! fbut CLEARLY no body's going to
go dropping anvils on people's heads just not how the real world works. and
if we do immitate this behavior that we've seen on a CARTOON (HENSE THE
NAME...CARTOON...IT'S NOT REALITY) , we know that there are reprocussions
to our actions, and this leads me back to knowing and teaching the
difference between right and wrong, as well as reality and fantasty.CASE
aAND POINT.
May 26, 2009 12:08 PM
Guest :
To look at only one factor ("among a world of madness" as one
commenter put it), is practically the definition of a scientific study. It
would be interesting to look at what other factors would do to these
results, but that is not, and probably never was the point. As a parent, I
try to be very careful about showing my 4 and 1 year olds violent stuff.
This is largely self-defense though. When they see violent stuff (loony
tunes, new batman cartoons, superman movies) they get crazy, parrot the
behaviors, and have nightmares. When the programming is removed, they
return to "normal". When I hear people disregard the results of a
study like this I tend to think that what they're really saying is: I've
shown my kids things others might called "violent", but the
egghead experts just call this a casual connection so that can't be the
real reason my kids act out and have bad dreams. It could be a million
other things. Well, you're right, it could be. But the violet expose
probably has more than a casual connection, and you know it.
Oct 19, 2009 6:23 PM
Guest :
god you know what all these people can blame cartoons from today but they
grew up watching much worse so does that mean there violent?
p.s
we learn right from wrong but hey its much easier to blame t.v i guess,if
you dont want your child watching it hen don't let them watch it don't get
mad at the show
Oct 21, 2009 10:52 AM
Guest :
i am doing a report on the controversies of looney toons and i like this
article becuz it gives me some information about the affects of violent
cartoons